Court says F*ck the First Amendment!

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/A/AZ_SIGN_RESTRICTIONS_AZOL-?SITE=AZMES&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

May 5, 2:47 PM EDT

Ruling upholds municipal law to restrict sign clutter

By PAUL DAVENPORT Associated Press Writer

PHOENIX (AP) -- Saying that cities have a stake in reducing visual clutter, a state court has rejected a doughnut shop owner's constitutional challenge to a municipal law that restricts how much of a business' windows can be covered by signs.

A Court of Appeals panel on Thursday upheld a trial judge's ruling in favor of Mesa in a lawsuit filed by Edward Salib after a city code enforcement officer ordered Salib's business to remove window signs.

The 1999 law prohibited advertising from covering more than a third of individual window panes in the downtown area, and city officials said it served the governmental purpose of keeping the area attractive.

Salib contended in his January 2003 lawsuit that the law violated his free-speech rights under the U.S. and Arizona constitutions, but the Court of Appeals ruled that the law met criteria previously set by the U.S. Supreme Court for allowing restraints on speech rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment.

"We conclude the sign code directly advances a substantial interest and is narrowly tailored to directly advance the goal of improved aesthetics," Judge Patrick Irvine wrote for a three-judge panel.

Salib also argued that the law violated the Arizona Constitution's free-speech protections by not being written as narrowly as possible, but the appellate court said that issue didn't amount to a question of constitutional law.

"The Arizona Constitution may require a tighter fit in some contexts, but for limits on window coverage the fit is already close and direct - the more restrictive the regulation, the more the aesthetic benefit," Irvine wrote. "Salib may disagree with Mesa as to whether the aesthetic benefits justify the restrictions, but as with many measures related to aesthetics, the wisdom of such restrictions are not a constitutional question appropriate for a court to decide."

Salib's attorneys expressed disappointment with the ruling and said he might appeal.

"We filed this lawsuit to vindicate Mr. Salib's right to freely communicate with his customers, and also to reinvigorate the constitutional protections for every Arizonan who engages in commercial speech," said Tim Keller, executive director of a public advocacy law firm, the Institute for Justice.

---

The case is Salib vs. City of Mesa, 1 CA-CV 04-0436.

---

On the Net:

Arizona Court of Appeals: http://www.cofad1.state.az.us


Crazy Atheist Libertarian
Crazy Atheist
Government Crimes
Government News
Religious Crimes
Religious News
Useless News!
Legal Library
Libertarians Talk
War Talk
Arizona Secular Humanists
Putz Cooks the ASH Book's
Cool Photos & Gif's
More cool Gif & JPEG images
Az Atheists United
HASHISH - Arizona
Messy Yard Criminals
Papers Please, the American Police State
Tempe Town Toilet
Tempe Town Lake
"David Dorn"    -    Hate Monger
"David Dorn" Government Snitch?
Free Kevin Walsh
U.S. Secret Service
Secret Service Political Prisoner
News about the Secret Service
WLA
Western Libertarian Alliance
Phoenix Copwatch
Copwatch
Friends